Knowledge has been a word and concept that
has been discussed for centuries. Since the first Greek philosophers, what it
means to know has been understood differently by many people. The Latin word
for knowledge is conscientia1,
which also means conscience and consciousness. With this, we can start
to understand how knowledge was originally understood and used. If it's similar
to consciousness, it must mean that knowledge is something only within
ourselves and can only exist there, just like the state of being conscious is
the awareness of one's own existence, sensations, thoughts, etc.3 That
means anything outside our mind we can't have any knowledge of; anything of the
physical world. This is the problem being addressed now: the very common misuse
of the verb to know. We can make very
simple claims such as "I know this table is brown" and still be
wrong. Our senses could be skewing all outside information to a great extent,
as suggested by the rationalist group of thought in philosophy. Due to this, we
won't ever have true knowledge of the colour of the table. Even the air as a
medium through which we see the table could be distorting many facts about it,
leaving us even further from the truth. The definition of knowledge says that
it's the apprehension of fact or truth with the mind; clear and certain
perception of fact or truth4. No matter how clear or certain your
perception is, perception is still the act of apprehending by means of the
senses or of the mind2 and we know that we can't fully trust our
senses.
There
is also a notion that knowledge is the highest level of thought. It is a
hierarchy of three thought levels: opinion, belief and knowledge. Opinion is at
the bottom, having the least general importance. Opinion is just something
personal and is different for everyone; it can be wrong or right or even
neither. Belief follows opinion. Belief is a much stronger opinion, backed up
by more evidence and reasoning and doesn't change as easily. I understand that
belief is the closest we can come to true knowledge. True knowledge is
something outside our grasp and outside our reality. I also want to introduce
Plato's Ideal World. To describe it very briefly, it is a theory that states
that there is an ideal world in all our minds where we are able to understand concepts
such as a perfect circle. When we draw a circle, we try to imitate this perfect
circle from our mind but it will always be impossible. I understand that true
knowledge resides in this ideal world and only there. Therefore I want to
emphasize the importance of using phrases such as "I strongly
believe" versus "I know" in almost any case. This way, you will
be more accurate with your display of your knowledge.
Bibliography
1. "Latin Word for Knowledge >>
Conscientia." Latin Word List.
http://www.latinwordlist.com/latin-word-for/latin-word-for-knowledge-13125180.htm
(accessed November 13, 2012).
2. "Perception." Dictionary.com.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/perception?s=t (accessed November 13,
2012).
3. "conscious." Dictionary.com.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conscious?s=t (accessed November 13,
2012).
4. "knowledge, n.." Oxford English
Dictionary. http://oed.com/view/Entry/104170?rskey=IIiFAM&result=1#eid
(accessed November 13, 2012).
No comments:
Post a Comment