A
community is a concept very regularly used in a positive manner. It speaks to
us about collaboration, unification, effort and aid. The term is far from the
idea of singularity, and this is seen when looked at
the first use of the word, back in 1130. It came from the Old French word
communité meaning joint ownership3. From this we can start to
understand that this is a collective collaboration of the people of a group,
where everyone is part of a bigger system which completely works for the
people, by the people. This also relates to the idea of communism, which is
defined as a system of social organization based on the holding of all property
in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole2.
I do understand that communism is more of a successful theory than a reality,
but if it was practiced in the right situation with the right constraints, it
could have very strong potential. China's current progress is an example of
this. An accepted definition today for community is the body of people having
common or equal rights or rank, as distinguished from the privileged
classes; the commons; the commonalty3. The community is something that works
together, in unison, and everyone with equally manageable responsibilities.
This was how the
term was solely used before the enormous growth of suburban sprawl. Here, we
can look at the problem of fake communities. The film Radiant City talks about
the suburbs of Calgary being fake communities; a social space which was
intended for a community, but doesn't function at all like a community. There
are very few interactions between the people who live there and their lives
consist of spending time at home, work or these power centres where all their
needs and resources reside. There is no downtown area, no visible cultural
groups and barely any open natural spaces. The word community in this context
is simply used as a tool in advertising. We used to know community as the
positive term explained above, but developers abused this idea and it can now be
understood as a cluster of houses with people living inside them and not
talking. This is a completely degraded use of the word, but that's how it has
been transformed through suburbia.
"In our culture of rugged individualism -
in which we generally feel that we dare not be honest about ourselves, even
with the person in the pew next to us - we bandy around the word community. We apply it to almost any collection of individuals - a
town, a church, a synagogue, a fraternal organization, an apartment complex, a professional
association - regardless of how poorly those individuals communicate with each other. It is a
false use of the word. If we are going to use the word meaningfully we must
restrict it to a group of individuals who have learned how to communicate
honestly with each other, whose relationships go deeper than their masks of
composure, and who have developed some significant commitment to 'rejoice together,
mourn together,' and to 'delight in each other, make others' conditions our
own.'"1
Bibliography
1. Peck, M. Scott. The Different Drum:
community-making and peace. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1987.
2. "community." Dictionary.com.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dictionary?s=t (accessed November 15,
2012).
3. "community, n.." Oxford English
Dictionary. http://oed.com/view/Entry/37337?redirectedFrom=community#eid
(accessed November 15, 2012).
No comments:
Post a Comment